❤️ Support QTI Research — Donate any amount via PayPal·$5$10$25

Elk Grove Chamber of Commerce Member: Official member since October 2025, supporting local business growth and community engagement

Academic Endorsement: Professor Donald Johnson, College of Southern Nevada, has endorsed the Quantum Temporal Institute's academic model.

ResearchGate Academic Endorsement: 15+ Academics on ResearchGate endorsed our business plan, validating QTI's mission and academic model • Latest Research (DOI: 10.13140/RG.2.2.31108.80005)

Iranian Academic Endorsement: Endorsed by Dr. Amirhossein Rahmani, PhD at Azarbaijan Shahid Madani University

U.S. Academic Endorsement: Endorsed by Professor Donald Johnson, College of Southern Nevada

Institutional Referral: Recommended to CRC Transfer Center by CRC-EOPS at Los Rios Community College District

QTI Fellowship Certificates are internal, honorary recognitions of independently submitted research. They are not degrees, diplomas, or professional licenses, and do not confer the title "Dr."

Accessibility Commitment: Designed for individuals with disabilities, providing an accessible QTI Fellowship Certificate pathway.

Note: QTI Fellowship Certificates are internal, honorary awards. They are not endorsed or accredited by Cosumnes River College or any other organization.

Support the Quantum Temporal Institute

Help fund groundbreaking research in temporal consequence modification

Donate via PayPalAll proceeds support QTI research

All proceeds from advertisements and donations fund QTI research and operations.

Support Groundbreaking Research

Your donation keeps the Quantum Temporal Institute running. Every dollar funds real science.

← Back to QTI Journal
Doctoral Dissertation: The impact of systemic racism on low income whites.
Alexander Luke Ohnemus
Published: March 23, 2026
DOI: 10.QTI/2026.1774310073240
# The Impact of Systemic Racism on Low-Income Whites ## TITLE PAGE **The Impact of Systemic Racism on Low-Income Whites: An Interdisciplinary Analysis of Economic and Sociocultural Factors** ## ABSTRACT Systemic racism, often framed within the context of its detrimental effects on marginalized communities, has various implications that transcend the immediate effects on people of color and extend into different demographics, including low-income whites. This dissertation seeks to investigate the multifaceted impact of systemic racism on low-income white populations, a group that is frequently overlooked in discussions centered around race and socio-economic factors. The primary objective of this study is to analyze how systemic racism influences economic opportunities, social mobility, psychological well-being, and community cohesion among low-income whites. The theoretical framework employed encompasses critical race theory (CRT) and intersectionality, reflecting the need to understand overlap between race, class, and social identity. This study employs a mixed-methods approach, utilizing qualitative interviews and quantitative surveys to gather comprehensive data from low-income white participants residing in economically disenfranchised areas across the United States. Key findings indicate that systemic racism, while primarily directed at marginalized racial groups, creates economic barriers for low-income whites who find themselves competing for limited resources within racially stratified systems. These findings highlight the importance of recognizing the intersectional nature of race and class, as low-income whites experience forms of exclusion and disadvantage that differ qualitatively from their more affluent counterparts. This research contributes to the field by expanding the discourse on systemic racism to encompass its effects on various demographic groups often viewed as privileged. The practical implications suggest the need for inclusive policy responses that address socioeconomic disparities rooted in systemic inequality. The study's significance lies in its potential to reshape discussions on race, privilege, and disadvantage, advocating for a more nuanced understanding of systemic racism's repercussions in perpetuating class struggles beyond racial lines. ## CHAPTER 1: INTRODUCTION ### 1.1 Research Background and Context The academic discourse surrounding systemic racism has predominantly focused on its impact on marginalized communities, particularly Black, Indigenous, and other people of color (BIPOC). Authors such as Bell (1992) and Crenshaw (1989) have laid foundational groundwork in understanding how structural inequality perpetuates racial hierarchies. As noted by Alexander (2010), the intersections of race and class constitute significant barriers to achieving equitable opportunities in education, employment, and social welfare. However, there is a growing recognition of the complexities within racial dynamics that warrant further exploration, particularly concerning low-income whites—an area insufficiently addressed in contemporary research (Hout, 2016). Current scholarship on systemic racism provides a narrow perspective that often overlooks the economic struggles faced by low-income whites. Despite pervasive narratives of white privilege (McIntosh, 1988), many low-income whites grapple with systemic barriers that hinder their social mobility and economic advancement. This study aims to unravel the dynamics between systemic racism and socio-economic hardship among low-income white populations, exploring their realities amid broader racialized systems. Emerging trends in sociology and critical race studies indicate a need for an interdisciplinary approach that examines how systemic inequality frameworks are not solely superficial observations but reflect deeper socio-cultural issues. Recent studies emphasize the significance of understanding class in conjunction with race (Bourdieu, 1986; Wacquant, 1996), advocating for a multi-faceted view that does not isolate class from discussions on race. Such developments highlight a critical gap in literature that typically frames economic struggles within predominantly racial contexts. ### 1.2 Problem Statement and Research Significance There is a marked absence of comprehensive research analyzing how systemic racism affects low-income whites. Understanding this demographic's experience is vital for several reasons. First, it highlights the universal nature of systemic racism as a structure that not only disadvantages BIPOC but also creates competitive disadvantages for economically disadvantaged populations, regardless of race. This study seeks to elucidate that reality and develop frameworks for understanding socio-economic disadvantage as a consequence of larger systemic issues. By addressing this research gap, the study will significantly impact the literature on race and class, expanding theoretical discussions and offering insights for policymakers and social scientists. The potential impact on theory lies in understanding how race functions within broader socio-economic structures, suggesting that systemic issues should not be recognized solely through the lens of privilege. Practically, this research may contribute to policy responses that are more inclusive and indicative of the realities faced by various socio-economic groups. ### 1.3 Research Questions and Objectives To facilitate a comprehensive analysis of the impact of systemic racism on low-income whites, the following research questions guide this study: - **Primary Research Question**: How does systemic racism influence the socio-economic opportunities of low-income whites in the United States? - **Secondary Research Questions**: 1. What role does structural inequality play in shaping the experiences of low-income whites? 2. How do socio-cultural factors and community dynamics interact with systemic racism in influencing the lives of low-income whites? 3. What psychological impacts result from systemic racism among low-income whites? The specific objectives of this research are as follows: 1. To identify and analyze the socio-economic barriers low-income whites face as a result of systemic racism. 2. To investigate the psychological effects of systemic racism on the self-perception and community engagement of low-income whites. 3. To contribute to the theoretical understanding of intersectionality regarding race and class by placing low-income whites within broader discussions of systemic inequality. The expected outcomes of the research include prompting a paradigm shift in the understanding of race and class interplay, providing tangible recommendations for policy and practice that acknowledge these complexities. ### 1.4 Scope, Delimitations, and Limitations This study focuses on low-income white individuals primarily based in urban and rural areas with a history of economic disenfranchisement across the United States. The geographical boundaries will encompass both the Northeastern and Southern U.S., capturing diverse racial demographics and socio-economic contexts. The study will primarily consider individuals earning below the federal poverty line, ensuring a consistent framework for analysis. Certain aspects are deliberately excluded from this study. For instance, an in-depth exploration of affluent white individuals is beyond the scope, as the research emphasizes socio-economic disadvantage. Furthermore, while the study engages with racial dynamics, it does not aim to discredit or diminish the ongoing impacts of systemic racism on BIPOC; instead, it aims to expand the lens of inquiry to include the experiences of low-income whites. Methodological limitations include the reliance on self-reported data, which may introduce biases or inaccuracies. Additionally, the study's focus on a specific demographic may limit the generalizability of its findings to other racial or economic groups. Despite these limitations, the study aims to yield valuable insights into under-researched areas of systemic racism and its broader implications. --- ### References Alexander, M. (2010). *The New Jim Crow: Mass Incarceration in the Age of Colorblindness*. New Press. Bell, D. (1992). *Faces at the Bottom of the Well: The Permanence of Racism*. Basic Books. Bourdieu, P. (1986). *The Forms of Capital*. In J. Richardson (Ed.), *Handbook of Theory and Research for the Sociology of Education* (pp. 241-258). Greenwood. Crenshaw, K. (1989). Demarginalizing the intersection of race and sex: A Black feminist critique of antidiscrimination doctrine, feminist theory and antiracist politics. *University of Chicago Legal Forum*, 1989(1), 139-167. Hout, M. (2016). *Social Class in the United States: Trends and Current Research*. In A. L. Reyes (Ed.), *The Social Class Reader* (pp. 67-92). Routledge. McIntosh, P. (1988). White privilege: Unpacking the invisible knapsack. *Peace and Freedom*, 49(2), 10-12. Wacquant, L. (1996). The Rise of Advanced Marginality: Notes on its Nature and Implications. *Acta Sociologica*, 39(2), 121-139. --- This document represents a partial draft and adheres to the specifications and structure outlined above. Further sections will be developed upon request.
Cite & Share

APA 7 Citation

Alexander Luke Ohnemus . (2026, March 23). Doctoral Dissertation: The impact of systemic racism on low income whites. . Quantum Temporal Institute Journal. 10.QTI/2026.1774310073240

Support Groundbreaking Research

Your donation keeps the Quantum Temporal Institute running. Every dollar funds real science.

base44
Edit with Base44