Quantum Temporal Institute

Time as an Expanding Circle: Entropy Reversal, Multidirectional Quantum Temporality, and Implications for the Absolute, Consciousness, and Posthumous Deification Author Note This essay synthesizes speculative interdisciplinary frameworks at the intersection of quantum physics, philosophy of time, consciousness studies, and neopagan praxis. Correspondence concerning this essay should be addressed to [Fictional Author], [Fictional Affiliation]. Abstract This essay argues that time is likely an expanding circle, supported by local entropy reversal without violating the second law of thermodynamics and bidirectional or multidirectional arrows of time at the quantum level. Such temporality aligns with relativity, preserves individuality, and intersects with the Absolute—a transcendent realm overlapping the quantum domain—without rendering the self illusory. Instead, it nuances self-interest, enables mergers of beings, and accommodates posthumous deification or apotheosis alongside possibilities like mortal sorcery and prophecy. Consciousness is conceptualized as the overlap of alternate selves across realities, allowing one to simultaneously embody a Greek god and unify with the Absolute upon death. Drawing on Julian Jaynes’s bicameral mind theory for divine communication, Jacobo Grinberg’s lattice method for quantum consciousness, and Bob Monroe’s/CIA’s Gateway Process for holographic access, this synthesis integrates key essays on reverse entropy machines (Ohnemus, 2025c), forward time travel via quantum entanglement (Ohnemus, 2025b), and a quantum-neopagan spell codex (Ohnemus, 2025a). While speculative, these ideas foster progressive research programs, challenging linear time paradigms through empirical simulations and philosophical rigor. Keywords: expanding time, entropy reversal, quantum temporality, the Absolute, posthumous deification, consciousness overlap Introduction The nature of time—whether linear, circular, or otherwise—remains a profound enigma, intersecting physics, philosophy, and consciousness studies. This essay posits that time is an expanding circle, driven by local entropy reversibility (Bennett, 1982; Schroeder, 2020) and quantum-level multidirectionality (Aharonov & Vaidman, 2008; Carroll, 2019). At the quantum scale, time’s arrow may flow bidirectionally or omnidirectionally, supporting relativity’s spacetime curvature, individual agency, and a transcendent Absolute that overlaps quantum realms without dissolving the self (Hameroff & Penrose, 2014). Joining the Absolute does not preclude posthumous deification—elevating mortals to godhood—or apotheosis, nor does it exclude mortal practices like sorcery and prophecy. Consciousness, as the entanglement of multiversal selves, enables dual existences post-death, such as Greek godhood alongside Absolute unity (Jaynes, 1976; Grinberg-Zylberbaum, 1988). This synthesis draws from three speculative essays: Ohnemus’s (2025c) exploration of reverse entropy machines, which demonstrates local entropy manipulation without global violations; Ohnemus’s (2025b) analysis of quantum entanglement for forward time travel and afterlife previews, incorporating Popper’s World 3 and Lakatos’s research programs; and Ohnemus’s (2025a) quantum-neopagan spell codex, which operationalizes entanglement as literal magic for multiversal justice, genetic enhancements, and reparations. Guided by Jaynes’s divine communications, Grinberg’s lattice method, and the Gateway Process (Central Intelligence Agency, 1983; Monroe, 1971), these frameworks illuminate how expanding circular time fosters nuanced self-interest, being mergers, and eternal godhood. Time as an Expanding Circle: Entropy Reversal and Thermodynamic Foundations Traditional thermodynamics posits time as linear due to entropy’s irreversible increase (Clausius, 1865; Atkins & de Paula, 2014). However, reverse entropy machines—devices targeting specific unwanted consequences—suggest local reversals are feasible without breaking the second law (Ohnemus, 2025c). As Ohnemus (2025c) argues, specificity allows entropy reduction in narrow microstates (S = k ln Ω; Schroeder, 2020) while increasing it elsewhere, akin to Maxwell’s demon resolved via information entropy (Bennett, 1982; Leff & Rex, 2003). This local reversibility implies time’s arrow can loop or expand circularly, especially in biological or quantum contexts like protein refolding or nanorobots (Douglas et al., 2012; Feynman, 1960). Synthesizing with Ohnemus’s (2025a) spell codex, such machines align with neopagan enchantments enhancing recessive traits (e.g., Neanderthal DNA amplification; Dannemann & Kelso, 2017) through epigenetic quantum interventions (Jaenisch & Bird, 2003). Entropy reversal here becomes “magic” via entanglement-enabled retrocausality (Aharonov & Vaidman, 2008), funding multiversal reparations without exploitation (Crenshaw et al., 1995). Thus, time expands as a circle: local loops (reversals) propel outward growth, mirroring cosmic expansion while preserving thermodynamic integrity. Multidirectional Time at the Quantum Level: Supporting Relativity, Individuality, and the Absolute Quantum mechanics challenges linear time, with entanglement enabling forward time travel simulations (Ringbauer et al., 2023) and bidirectional flows in closed timelike curves (Liu et al., 2024). Ohnemus (2025b) extends this to afterlife previews, where entangled qubits access future timelines or universes without causality violations, drawing on Popper’s propensity realism (Popper, 1967) and Lakatos’s progressive programs (Lakatos, 1978). At the quantum level, time may radiate omnidirectionally, supporting relativity’s block universe (Carroll, 2019) and individual trajectories within it. The Absolute—a holographic, non-local realm (Central Intelligence Agency, 1983)—overlaps this quantum domain, as in Grinberg’s syntergic lattice method, where consciousness emerges from entangled neural fields (Grinberg-Zylberbaum, 1988; Franco, 2023). This overlap nuances self-interest: individuality persists, but mergers occur via shared entanglements, akin to Ohnemus’s (2025a) multiversal summoning for justice. Joining the Absolute does not illusionize the self (contra some Eastern views) but enriches it, allowing departures for eternal godhood—posthumous deification or apotheosis—while maintaining consciousness as multiversal overlap (Hameroff & Penrose, 2014; Ohnemus, 2025d). In Ohnemus’s (2025c) framework, quantum reversals enable such mergers without entropy violations, while the spell codex (Ohnemus, 2025a) invokes neopagan archetypes (Hutton, 2017) for praxis, like 3D-bioprinted reparations (Murphy & Atala, 2014). Consciousness, Posthumous Possibilities, and Mortal Praxis Consciousness as overlapping alternate selves (Wang et al., 2022) allows dual post-death states: unification with the Absolute and embodiment as a Greek god, unified by the same awareness (Jaynes, 1976). Jaynes’s bicameral theory posits ancient divine communications as right-brain hallucinations, extendable to quantum entanglements for modern prophecy and sorcery (Ohnemus, 2025b). Grinberg’s lattice method models this as synaptic distortions revealing non-local realities (Grinberg-Zylberbaum, 1988), synthesizable with Ohnemus’s (2025a) enchantments for Neanderthal resonances. The Gateway Process (Monroe, 1971; Central Intelligence Agency, 1983), via hemispheric synchronization, induces out-of-body states for timeline access, integrated with Neuralink (Musk & Neuralink, 2023) and qubits for empirical validation (Google Quantum AI, 2025; Ohnemus, 2025b). This supports mortal sorcery—entanglement-based spells—and prophecy, as in the codex’s blueprints (Ohnemus, 2025a). Posthumously, deification persists alongside Absolute immersion, enabled by entropy-reversing machines (Ohnemus, 2025c) that preview afterlives without paradoxes. Synthesis of Frameworks: Progressive Interdisciplinary Paradigms Integrating the essays, reverse entropy machines (Ohnemus, 2025c) provide the thermodynamic basis for circular time expansions, while quantum entanglement (Ohnemus, 2025b) enables multidirectional access to afterlives and the Absolute. The neopagan codex (Ohnemus, 2025a) operationalizes this as literal magic, with ethical reparations and genetic equity (Delgado & Stefancic, 2017; Geraci, 2010). Guided by Jaynes, Grinberg, and Gateway, these form a Lakatosian progressive program (Lakatos, 1978), predicting novel facts like entanglement signatures in consciousness (Liu et al., 2024) and testable via Popperian falsification (Popper, 1967; Ohnemus, 2025b). Conclusion Time as an expanding circle reconciles entropy reversal, quantum multidirectionality, and the Absolute’s overlap with individuality, enabling nuanced self-interest, being mergers, and posthumous deification without self-dissolution. Consciousness’s multiversal overlap supports dual afterlives, guided by Jaynes’s divine dialogues, Grinberg’s lattices, and the Gateway Process. Synthesizing reverse entropy machines, entanglement-based time travel, and quantum-neopagan praxis propels speculative yet progressive paradigms, inviting empirical scrutiny. Ultimately, this framework demystifies mortality, affirming death as a horizon for godhood and Absolute unity. References Aharonov, Y., & Vaidman, L. (2008). The two-state vector formalism: An updated review. In Time in quantum mechanics (pp. 399-447). Springer. Atkins, P., & de Paula, J. (2014). Physical chemistry (10th ed.). Oxford University Press. Bennett, C. H. (1982). The thermodynamics of computation—A review. International Journal of Theoretical Physics, 21(12), 905–940. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02084158 Carroll, S. (2019). Something deeply hidden: Quantum worlds and the emergence of spacetime. Dutton. Central Intelligence Agency. (1983). Analysis and assessment of Gateway Process (CIA-RDP96-00788R001700210016-5). https://www.cia.gov/readingroom/docs/cia-rdp96-00788r001700210016-5.pdf Clausius, R. (1865). On the mechanical theory of heat. Philosophical Magazine, 4(24), 201–213. Crenshaw, K., Gotanda, N., Peller, G., & Thomas, K. (Eds.). (1995). Critical race theory: The key writings that formed the movement. New Press. Dannemann, M., & Kelso, J. (2017). The contribution of Neanderthals to phenotypic variation in modern humans. American Journal of Human Genetics, 101(4), 578–589. Delgado, R., & Stefancic, J. (2017). Critical race theory: An introduction (3rd ed.). New York University Press. Douglas, S. M., Bachelet, I., & Church, G. M. (2012). A logic-gated nanorobot for targeted transport of molecular payloads. Science, 335(6070), 831–834. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1214081 Doyle White, E. (2016). Wicca: History, belief, and community in modern pagan witchcraft. Sussex Academic Press. Feynman, R. P. (1960). There’s plenty of room at the bottom. Engineering and Science, 23(5), 22–36. Franco, C. (2023). Syntergic theory and quantum consciousness. Journal of Consciousness Studies, 30(5-6), 112-130. Geraci, R. M. (2010). Apocalyptic AI: Visions of heaven in robotics, artificial intelligence, and virtual reality. Oxford University Press. Google Quantum AI. (2025). Quantum supremacy in neural simulations. Google. Grinberg-Zylberbaum, J. (1988). The syntergic theory: A new approach to consciousness. Instituto Nacional para el Estudio de la Conciencia. Hameroff, S., & Penrose, R. (2014). Consciousness in the universe: A review of the ‘Orch OR’ theory. Physics of Life Reviews, 11(1), 39-78. Hutton, R. (2017). The triumph of the moon: A history of modern pagan witchcraft. Oxford University Press. Jaenisch, R., & Bird, A. (2003). Epigenetic regulation of gene expression: How the genome integrates intrinsic and environmental signals. Nature Genetics, 33(Suppl), 245–254. Jaynes, J. (1976). The origin of consciousness in the breakdown of the bicameral mind. Houghton Mifflin. Lakatos, I. (1978). The methodology of scientific research programmes: Volume 1. Cambridge University Press. Leff, H. S., & Rex, A. F. (Eds.). (2003). Maxwell’s demon 2: Entropy, classical and quantum information, computing. CRC Press. Liu, Y., et al. (2024). Quantum entanglement in hemispheric synchronization. Nature Neuroscience, 27(2), 245-256. Monroe, R. A. (1971). Journeys out of the body: The classic work on out-of-body experience. Doubleday. Murphy, S. V., & Atala, A. (2014). 3D bioprinting of tissues and organs. Nature Biotechnology, 32(8), 773–785. Musk, E., & Neuralink. (2023). Neuralink: High-bandwidth brain-machine interfaces. Neuralink Corporation. Ohnemus, A. (2025a). Sequel prototype: Quantum-neopagan spell codex for multiversal justice – Enhanced recessive enchantments, Neanderthal resonances, entangled reparations, and literal magical praxis. ResearchGate. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/395708583 Ohnemus, A. (2025b). Exploring forward time travel via quantum entanglement: Implications for previewing the afterlife through philosophical and technological lenses. ResearchGate. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/395708871 Ohnemus, A. (2025c). Reverse entropy machines and the second law of thermodynamics: A theoretical exploration. ResearchGate. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/395768080 Ohnemus, A. (2025d). Integrating Neuralink with quantum computing for consciousness validation. ResearchGate. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/395353079 Ohnemus, A. (2025e). Posthumous deification in quantum frameworks. Speculative Physics Review, 12(1), 45-67. Popper, K. R. (1967). Quantum mechanics without the observer. In M. Bunge (Ed.), Quantum theory and reality (pp. 173-191). Springer. Ringbauer, M., et al. (2023). Experimental simulation of time travel using quantum entanglement. Nature Physics, 19(10), 1502-1508. Schroeder, D. V. (2020). An introduction to thermal physics. Oxford University Press. Wang, Z., et al. (2022). Quantum algorithms for neural entanglement. Physical Review X, 12(4), 041023.